Meaningful content.
Clear boundaries.

Separate the kinds of information

Our guides distinguish source-supported facts, calculation settings, design recommendations, and symbolic interpretations. A citation supports the particular point associated with it; it does not imply that the cited organization endorses GeminiAPI.com or astrology as a predictive system.

Use sources for the claims they support

Technical articles link to relevant primary documentation or authoritative educational resources. Sources used in this collection include NASA/JPL documentation, the IANA Time Zone Database, W3C accessibility and language guidance, Swiss Ephemeris documentation, the European Southern Observatory, the University of California, Berkeley, and the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. Each long-form article contains one selected editorial source link relevant to its subject.

The surrounding application-design recommendations are editorial proposals, not a claim that a source prescribes this site’s example schema. We do not invent search-volume figures, service performance metrics, partnership claims, or author credentials.

Label examples and keep scope visible

Local JSON fixtures are labeled illustrative or editorial. Empty arrays stay empty when no calculation has been made. A decorative image is not presented as a personal chart. The website does not advertise endpoints, service plans, or live data it does not provide.

Protect reader agency

Interpretations should remain optional and non-deterministic. We avoid claims of unavoidable personal events, compatibility verdicts, verified past lives, and spiritual blame. Relationship and karmic content should not pressure someone to tolerate harm or make consequential decisions from a chart.

Keep health boundaries explicit

Medical-astrology coverage is historical and cultural. It must not diagnose, assess symptoms, forecast illness, recommend treatment, or suggest delaying care. A disclaimer is not a substitute for making the page’s actual content consistent with that scope.

Correct meaningful errors

Report a factual problem, unclear setting, or broken source link through the contact page. Include the page address and the point that needs attention. When a material correction is published, the relevant passage and its dependent displays should be reviewed together. A change in wording should not be represented as a new calculation.

Make the experience accessible

Use readable text, meaningful image alternatives, keyboard-reachable controls, and layouts that adapt to small screens. Essential warnings should remain visible without requiring a hover gesture or decoding a color. A useful explanation should work beyond the decorative cosmic style.